Compare commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2f060c479e | ||
|
|
86cf1b6f81 |
No files matched your search
@@ -100,4 +100,4 @@ The owner retains publication identity/order, mandatory status, complete durable
|
|||||||
artifacts, verification and Operator acceptance. These packages customize
|
artifacts, verification and Operator acceptance. These packages customize
|
||||||
answer/detail/example/acknowledgement presentation only.
|
answer/detail/example/acknowledgement presentation only.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The automatic `research-auto` Planner package supplies primary-source selection, preferred-domain exploration/refinement and evidence-reading methodology. The manual `research` package remains available on request. Tool arguments, budgets, continuation, recovery and untrusted research provenance belong to the owner.
|
The automatic `research-auto` Planner package supplies primary-source selection, preferred-domain exploration/refinement and evidence-reading methodology, publication/version checking, corroboration and already-admitted empirical evidence methods. The manual `research` package remains available on request. Tool arguments, budgets, continuation, recovery and untrusted research provenance belong to the owner.
|
||||||
@@ -3,9 +3,21 @@ name: research-auto
|
|||||||
description: Source selection and reading methods for assigned Planner research.
|
description: Source selection and reading methods for assigned Planner research.
|
||||||
metadata:
|
metadata:
|
||||||
relayview-display-name: Research methodology
|
relayview-display-name: Research methodology
|
||||||
relayview-version: 0.12.1
|
relayview-version: 0.12.2
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Research methodology
|
# Research methodology
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Prefer primary sources: the official specification, documentation, or source repository that owns a claim. When an applicable authoritative domain is already known, preferredDomains may rank it higher; omit the option during broad exploration and refine a later search after discovering the right domain. Prefer narrow publisher hosts over broad multi-tenant hosts, and inspect/fetch returned sources before relying on them.
|
Prefer primary sources: applicable official documentation, specifications, source code, release notes, maintainer records, and reproducible first-party artifacts that own a claim; use secondary sources for orientation and corroboration. When an applicable authoritative domain is already known, preferredDomains may rank it higher; omit the option during broad exploration and refine a later search after discovering the right domain. Prefer narrow publisher hosts over broad multi-tenant hosts, and inspect/fetch returned sources before relying on them.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When external research is material, use web_search to discover candidate public sources before web_fetching selected applicable evidence instead of guessing a destination URL.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Check publication date, applicable product and version, and whether a source supports the precise claim. State uncertainty, conflicts, missing access, and inferences explicitly.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Corroborate consequential or surprising claims with independent evidence when practical; mirrors, syndication, repetition, and pages derived from one upstream source are not independent.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For an empirically testable technical claim, prefer a small reproducible local experiment only when this role already has an approved execution capability. Record the question, procedure, relevant versions and resolved paths, observation, and limitations; do not generalize beyond the tested environment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use confidence language proportional to the evidence and identify claims that still depend on provider ranking, inaccessible sources, or unverified assumptions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Repeat an exact query only when the cached result is intentionally sufficient; use a materially narrower query when new terms, version, claim, or source scope justify a distinct auditable search.
|
||||||
@@ -2,14 +2,14 @@
|
|||||||
"schemaVersion": 1,
|
"schemaVersion": 1,
|
||||||
"source": {
|
"source": {
|
||||||
"kind": "first-party",
|
"kind": "first-party",
|
||||||
"reference": "v0.12.1"
|
"reference": "v0.12.2"
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
"role": "planner",
|
"role": "planner",
|
||||||
"step": "planning",
|
"step": "planning",
|
||||||
"files": [
|
"files": [
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"path": "SKILL.md",
|
"path": "SKILL.md",
|
||||||
"sha256": "235b41d631c6d7e65b24fc902170ec8beb4c0a6b5ed2ff9b70d30bec6c9db58f"
|
"sha256": "112036daeb1f760093345805b8c17b1f385723f3597608cf8ad19d72023ccd74"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ class PackageTests(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||||||
text = (package / "SKILL.md").read_text()
|
text = (package / "SKILL.md").read_text()
|
||||||
self.assertIn("omit the option during broad exploration", text)
|
self.assertIn("omit the option during broad exploration", text)
|
||||||
self.assertIn("inspect/fetch returned sources", text)
|
self.assertIn("inspect/fetch returned sources", text)
|
||||||
|
self.assertIn("Check publication date", text)
|
||||||
|
self.assertIn("Corroborate consequential", text)
|
||||||
self.assertNotIn("spawn", text)
|
self.assertNotIn("spawn", text)
|
||||||
self.assertNotIn("save a research file", text)
|
self.assertNotIn("save a research file", text)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user