The packaging commit shipped the code and a summary of the numbers. It left out
everything the numbers are measured *against*, which is most of what makes them
checkable.
Added:
baselines/ llama.cpp runs (thread sweeps, NUMA sweeps, the
interleaved A/B passes behind the headline decode
figure) and the quality references: each build
against its own bf16 over 12 greedy prompts.
benchmarks/.../results/ 102 artifacts backing the published figures, each
with a provenance block naming the model,
quantization, thread set and build SHAs.
docs/engines/ the engine analyses -- llama.cpp, ExecuTorch, MNN,
ncnn, vLLM, vLLM-Omni -- and the cross-engine and
device-simulation comparisons.
docs/analysis/ the full study documents the summaries distil.
docs/edge/comparisons.md where this fork sits against llama.cpp and why:
decode is llama.cpp's, prefill is ours by ~2x, and
since neither engine exceeds 39% of the measured
222 GB/s ceiling the decode gap is the execution
model rather than the kernels.
docs/edge/environment.md pins and machine, and the correction below.
On "the modified vllm": there isn't one, and the doc says so plainly because it
is the obvious assumption. The vLLM checkout is clean upstream (0 commits
ahead, 0 uncommitted) and the installed wheel is stock 0.28.0+cpu. This fork
changes vLLM's CPU *behaviour* through vLLM's own extension points at import
time -- three CPU patches in vllm_omni/patch.py, the quantization-config
registry, the IR op registry, platform hooks -- specifically so the changes
survive a wheel upgrade rather than being lost on it. One of those patches is
why "KV sizing is not a memory lever" looked true for months: CpuPlatform
overwrote kv_cache_memory_bytes unconditionally, so the setting had no effect.
There is no patch series to apply; pin the version and let patch.py do the rest.
.gitignore gains explicit exceptions: upstream's blanket `*.json` and `results/`
rules were silently eating the measurement artifacts, which in this fork are the
substance rather than build output. Binary captures stay ignored.
No vLLM or llama.cpp source is redistributed -- only output produced with them.
NOTICE records both.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01L1ax5wYLA6XbqEL1i8L9gZ
5.3 KiB
vllm-embedding
A fork of vLLM-Omni for running multimodal models on edge CPUs — machines with tens of gigabytes of RAM and no GPU, rather than servers.
The upstream project targets datacentre inference. Getting the same models onto a mini-PC or a gateway box turns out to be less about kernels than about three things nobody profiles: how much memory is resident while the model loads, how much is resident that nothing ever reads, and whether the number you just measured came from the code path you thought it did.
Upstream's own README is preserved at docs/README.vllm-omni.md.
What's here
| area | where |
|---|---|
| 4-bit CPU quantization | vllm_omni/model_executor/layers/quantization/cpu_int4.py — W4A16 on PyTorch's tinygemm kernel, prefill reading the kernel's own weight layout instead of a duplicate |
| Memory | RoPE tables sized to the servable context; weights repacked in blocks; a KV budget that is actually honoured on CPU |
| CPU platform + vLLM patches | vllm_omni/platforms/cpu/, vllm_omni/patch.py — vLLM itself is unmodified; see docs/edge/environment.md |
| Device routing | vllm_omni/edge/weight_path.py picks the weight format per device class, from measurements rather than assumption |
| Measurement harness | benchmarks/edge_harness/ — the grid runner, benchmarks, memory ledger, fidelity metric and agent suite every number here came from |
| Raw results | benchmarks/edge_harness/results/ — 100+ artifacts backing the published figures, each with provenance |
| Baselines | baselines/ — llama.cpp runs and the comparison scripts |
| Engine analyses | docs/engines/ — llama.cpp, ExecuTorch, MNN, ncnn, vLLM, vLLM-Omni |
| Study documents | docs/analysis/ — the full reports these summaries distil |
Headline results
Spark-X2.5-1.7B, Xeon Platinum 8480C, 24 pinned node-local cores, W4A16 g128. Every figure is a median of at least three interleaved passes against a control arm, on a shared host where end-to-end throughput swings ~30% run to run.
Memory — each measured as its own A/B with the alternative reachable by a flag:
| lever | saving | cost |
|---|---|---|
| KV budget 1 GiB → 192 MiB | 843 MB | fewer cached tokens |
RoPE table capped to max_model_len |
618 MB | none |
| One packed weight layout instead of two | 615 MB | ~1.6× prefill |
| Blocked weight repack | 489 MB of load-time peak | none |
These overlap and must not be added — see docs/edge/results.md.
Speed, same machine:
| path | decode | prefill (pp512) |
|---|---|---|
W4A8 (AMX int4_scaled_mm_cpu) |
74.4 tok/s | — |
| W4A16 (tinygemm) | 71.6 tok/s | 2190 tok/s |
cpu_gemm_wna16 fallback |
32.3 tok/s | — |
| llama.cpp Q4_K_M (reference) | 90.0 tok/s | 1121 tok/s |
Decode is llama.cpp's; prefill is ours by ~2×. Neither engine is bandwidth-bound — both sit at 33–39% of the measured 222 GB/s ceiling — so the decode gap is the execution model, not the kernels. See docs/edge/comparisons.md.
Why the numbers here are worth reading
This project has retracted five conclusions, every one of them a measurement error rather than a coding error. The harness exists because of them:
- a "3.1 GB saving" that was
VmRSScounting the mmap'd checkpoint; - W4A8 timings taken on a checkpoint whose output head was silently left in bf16;
- a memory benchmark reading
/proc/self/statuswhile the model ran in a worker process; - "KV sizing saves only 188 MB" — measured through a code path that discarded the setting, so both arms ran the same cache;
- a 1.9× prefill cost quoted from the one pass of a grid whose other passes had crashed.
docs/edge/methodology.md is the resulting discipline, and it is the most transferable thing in this repository.
Quick start
# CPU build of vLLM, then this fork
pip install vllm==0.28.0+cpu
VLLM_TARGET_DEVICE=cpu pip install -e .
# a right-sized edge deployment
VLLM_CPU_KVCACHE_SPACE=1 python -c "
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
llm = LLM(model='<your-cpu_int4-checkpoint>', quantization='cpu_int4',
dtype='bfloat16', max_model_len=2048, max_num_seqs=1,
kv_cache_memory_bytes=192 << 20) # the single largest memory lever
print(llm.generate(['Hello'], SamplingParams(max_tokens=32))[0].outputs[0].text)
"
Documentation
| docs/edge/results.md | every measured figure, with spread and baseline |
| docs/edge/methodology.md | how to measure on a shared machine without fooling yourself — the five retractions and the rules they left |
| docs/edge/cpu-4bit.md | the two 4-bit paths, the packed layout as measured, building a checkpoint |
| docs/edge/comparisons.md | against llama.cpp and the other engines considered |
| docs/edge/environment.md | pins, machine, and why there is no vLLM patch series |
| docs/edge/harness.md | running a comparison |
| ROADMAP.md | what is next, with expected gains and how each would be verified — and what was rejected |
Licence
Apache-2.0, inherited from vLLM-Omni. See LICENSE and NOTICE.