Signed-off-by: Shenglei Fu <sfu@confluent.io> Signed-off-by: Shenglei Fu <117230642+ShengleiFu@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
22 KiB
Boogu-Image
Text-to-image and image-editing online serving (Boogu-Image-0.1-Base / -Turbo / -Edit / -Edit-Turbo)
Summary
- Vendor: Boogu
- Model:
Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base(text-to-image),Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo(four-step text-to-image),Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit(image editing), andBoogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit-Turbo(four-step image editing) - Task: Text-to-image generation and text-guided image editing (TI2I)
- Mode: Online serving with the OpenAI-compatible API
- Maintainer: Community
When to use this recipe
Use this recipe when you want a known-good starting point for serving
Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base, Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo,
Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit, or Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit-Turbo with
vLLM-Omni's native pipeline (no
--diffusion-load-format diffusers, and the upstream boogu package is not
required).
Boogu-Image-0.1 is an Apache-2.0 unified image generation and editing model
family. The Base text-to-image checkpoint pairs a Qwen3-VL multimodal encoder
with a Diffusion Transformer (DiT) and a flow-match Euler scheduler with
time-shift. It handles photorealistic generation and Chinese/English text
rendering. The Edit checkpoint uses the native BooguImagePipeline, while the
distilled Turbo and Edit-Turbo checkpoints run the four-step DMD path through
BooguImageTurboPipeline.
References
- Upstream model card: https://huggingface.co/Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
- Turbo model card: https://huggingface.co/Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo
- Edit model card: https://huggingface.co/Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit
- Edit-Turbo 1K hotfix: https://huggingface.co/Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit-Turbo/tree/hotfix-1k-20260708
- Project page: https://boogu.org
- GitHub: https://github.com/boogu-project/Boogu-Image
- Related example:
examples/online_serving/text_to_image/
Hardware Support
This recipe documents supported configurations for CUDA GPU serving. The native pipeline supports single-GPU inference and classifier-free-guidance (CFG) parallelism. CPU offload, cache acceleration, and other multi-GPU dimensions remain unsupported (see Notes).
GPU
1 x A100/H100 (Single GPU, 40GB+ VRAM)
The model footprint is roughly 34.6 GiB on GPU, so a 40GB+ card is recommended.
Command
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base --omni --port 8091
!!! note
If you hit Out-of-Memory (OOM) on a smaller card, enable VAE slicing and
tiling to reduce peak memory: --vae-use-slicing --vae-use-tiling.
Verification
After the server is ready, test with a simple request:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8091/v1/images/generations \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base",
"prompt": "A mountain lake at sunset, photorealistic, cinematic lighting",
"size": "1024x1024",
"num_inference_steps": 28,
"guidance_scale": 4.0,
"seed": 42
}' | jq -r '.data[0].b64_json' | base64 -d > output.png
Or via the chat-completions endpoint (parameters go in extra_body):
curl -s http://localhost:8091/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"messages": [
{"role": "user", "content": "A mountain lake at sunset, photorealistic, cinematic lighting"}
],
"extra_body": {
"height": 1024,
"width": 1024,
"num_inference_steps": 28,
"guidance_scale": 4.0,
"seed": 42
}
}' | jq -r '.choices[0].message.content[0].image_url.url' | cut -d',' -f2- | base64 -d > output.png
Notes
- Memory usage: ~34.6 GiB on GPU. Use
--vae-use-slicing --vae-use-tilingto trim peak VRAM if needed. - Key flags:
--omni— enables vLLM-Omni diffusion serving.
- Guidance: Boogu-Image uses
guidance_scale(mapped to the upstreamtext_guidance_scale); the default is4.0. Classifier-free guidance is active wheneverguidance_scale > 1.0. - Recommended settings:
num_inference_steps=28-50,guidance_scale=4.0. The model's maximum native resolution is 2K. - Known limitations (not yet supported): CPU offload
(
--enable-cpu-offload/--enable-layerwise-offload), Cache-DiT (--cache-backend cache_dit), and TP / SP / HSDP multi-GPU parallelism.
2 x H100 (CFG parallel, Base T2I)
Base T2I has two predictions per guided denoising step, so two CFG ranks map one-to-one to the positive and negative-text branches:
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base \
--omni \
--cfg-parallel-size 2 \
--port 8091
Use guidance_scale > 1.0 to activate the parallel two-branch path. Requests
with guidance_scale=1.0 remain valid on the same server: every rank evaluates
only the positive branch, no negative embeddings are built, and no guidance is
applied.
1 x RTX 4090 24 GB / 48 GB (FP8)
Boogu-Image supports the following FP8 loading paths:
| Path | Checkpoints | MLLM | DiT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-quantized FP8 | Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-{Base,Edit}-fp8 |
HF checkpoint FP8 configuration | TorchAO FP8 weight-only (W8A16) |
| Online FP8 | Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-{Base,Edit} |
Optional 128x128 block FP8: Triton W8A8 (vLLM 0.28.0); Marlin W8A16 (vLLM 0.29.0) | Native dynamic FP8 (CUTLASS W8A8) |
Environment
The following isolated environments were used for Base T2I and Edit I2I measurements at 512x512:
- OS: Linux
- Python: 3.12
- Driver / runtime: NVIDIA CUDA environment with one RTX 4090 48 GB GPU
- vLLM version: Match the vLLM-Omni checkout used for deployment
- vLLM-Omni version or commit: Use a commit that contains TorchAO FP8 checkpoint loading for diffusion models
- TorchAO version: 0.17.0
kernels/kernels-data: 0.16.1 / 0.16.1- Transformers: 5.17.0
- Tokenizers: 0.23.1
Command
Serve the official Base FP8 checkpoint using its pre-quantized TorchAO FP8 weight-only transformer weights:
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base-fp8 \
--omni \
--port 8091 \
--diffusion-quantization-config \
'{"transformer":{"method":"torchao_float8_weight_only"}}'
Native online FP8:
# DiT only
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base \
--omni \
--port 8091 \
--diffusion-quantization-config \
'{"mllm":null,"transformer":"fp8","vae":null}'
# MLLM + DiT
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base \
--omni \
--port 8091 \
--quantization fp8
# MLLM + DiT (using --diffusion-quantization-config)
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base \
--omni \
--port 8091 \
--diffusion-quantization-config \
'{"mllm":"fp8","transformer":"fp8","vae":null}'
For image editing, replace Base with Edit and keep the corresponding
quantization configuration.
Notes
-
Memory usage:
- The serialized TorchAO FP8 path uses approximately 21.1 GiB at 512x512 and 24.2-24.6 GiB at 1024x1024.
- The DiT-only online FP8 path uses approximately 26.9 GiB at 512x512 and 29.9-30.9 GiB at 1024x1024.
- The MLLM + DiT online FP8 path uses approximately 20.5-20.6 GiB at 512x512 and 23.6-24.5 GiB at 1024x1024.
-
Quantization scope: For original Base/Edit checkpoints,
--quantization fp8quantizes the MLLM's language-model linear layers through per-block FP8 and the DiT's linear layers through native online FP8. The vision encoder, embeddings, normalization layers and VAE remain unquantized. -
Performance: In the 48 GB Base/Edit benchmarks at 512x512, both DiT-only and MLLM + DiT online FP8 reduced E2E latency by over 10 seconds compared with official FP8 and vLLM-Omni pre-quantized FP8. The main runtime difference lies in the DiT quantization implementation, which switches from TorchAO weight-only FP8 (W8A16) to native CUTLASS W8A8 kernels. This reduces additional dequantization overhead and enables FP8 Tensor Core acceleration.
-
Known Limitation:
-
Output consistency: With MLLM + DiT online FP8, same-seed outputs may visibly differ from BF16 for some Base prompts, but these differences do not mean lower image quality.
-
Import compatibility conflict between TorchAO and Diffusers:: Loading pre-quantized checkpoints requires
torchao>=0.17.0, which has a compatibility conflict withdiffusers==0.40.0. This produces a warning when Diffusers is imported, but currently does not affect Boogu-Image weight loading. -
Conflict between the default kernels and Transformers versions: The default Transformers version range (
>=5.10.1,<5.15) conflicts withkernels==0.16.1when loading pre-quantized FP8 MLLM weights through Hugging FaceFP8Linear. When using this loading path withkernels==0.16.1, please upgrade Transformers to5.17.0.
-
Verification
The request format is shared by both FP8 paths. Set <MODEL_ID> to the model
ID passed to vllm serve. For example, use
Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base-fp8 for serialized TorchAO FP8 or
Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base for native online FP8. For image editing, use the
corresponding Edit model.
Base text-to-image:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8091/v1/images/generations \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "<MODEL_ID>",
"prompt": "A mountain lake at sunset, photorealistic, cinematic lighting",
"size": "1024x1024",
"num_inference_steps": 28,
"guidance_scale": 4.0,
"seed": 42
}' | jq -r '.data[0].b64_json' | base64 -d > output_fp8.png
Image editing:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8091/v1/images/edits \
-F model="<MODEL_ID>" \
-F image="@input.png" \
-F prompt="Change the style to a colored pencil drawing." \
-F num_inference_steps=28 \
-F guidance_scale=4.0 \
-F guidance_scale_2=1.0 \
-F seed=42 \
| jq -r '.data[0].b64_json' | base64 -d > edited_fp8.png
Fast text-to-image (Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo)
Turbo is the distilled text-to-image checkpoint. Its model_index.json
declares BooguImageTurboPipeline, which runs the four-step DMD path instead
of the scheduler-driven path used by Base.
Command
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo --omni --port 8091
Verification
curl -X POST http://localhost:8091/v1/images/generations \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo",
"prompt": "A mountain lake at sunset, photorealistic, cinematic lighting",
"size": "1024x1024",
"seed": 42
}' | jq -r '.data[0].b64_json' | base64 -d > output-turbo.png
### Notes
- **Required settings:** `guidance_scale=1.0` and `guidance_scale_2=1.0`; any
other value is rejected. `num_inference_steps` defaults to 4. All three are
pipeline defaults, so the request above omits them.
- **Resolution:** upstream constrains Turbo to 1K, so `1024x1024` is the
supported working resolution. The shared pipeline still clamps at 2K; larger
sizes are not validated for this checkpoint.
- **Known limitations:** the same single-GPU limitations as Base apply; CPU
offload, Cache-DiT, and multi-GPU parallelism are not yet validated.
## Image editing (Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit)
The Edit checkpoint is served by the same native pipeline (`BooguImagePipeline`);
the image-editing (TI2I) path activates automatically when a request carries a
reference image. The Base text-to-image path is unaffected (no reference image
is sent).
### Command
```bash
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit --omni --port 8091
For text-only or image-only guidance, use two CFG ranks:
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit \
--omni \
--cfg-parallel-size 2 \
--port 8091
Double guidance has three predictions per denoising step. It supports either two ranks (round-robin assignment: rank 0 runs branches 0 and 2) or three ranks (one branch per rank):
# Practical two-GPU configuration
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit \
--omni \
--cfg-parallel-size 2 \
--port 8091
# Maximum branch parallelism
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit \
--omni \
--cfg-parallel-size 3 \
--port 8091
Verification
Edit an image with /v1/images/edits (the model-card example — change a photo
to a colored-pencil drawing). Diffusion parameters are plain multipart form
fields; add guidance_scale_2 to enable image guidance (double-guidance path):
curl -s http://localhost:8091/v1/images/edits \
-F model="Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit" \
-F image="@input.png" \
-F prompt="Change the style to a colored pencil drawing." \
-F num_inference_steps=28 \
-F guidance_scale=5.0 \
-F guidance_scale_2=2.0 \
-F seed=42 \
| jq -r '.data[0].b64_json' | base64 -d > edited.png
Or via chat completions (attach the image as a data URL; parameters go in
extra_body):
curl -s http://localhost:8091/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"messages": [
{"role": "user", "content": [
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": "data:image/png;base64,<BASE64>"}},
{"type": "text", "text": "Change the style to a colored pencil drawing."}
]}
],
"extra_body": {
"num_inference_steps": 28,
"guidance_scale": 5.0,
"guidance_scale_2": 1.0,
"seed": 42
}
}' | jq -r '.choices[0].message.content[0].image_url.url' | cut -d',' -f2- | base64 -d > edited.png
Notes
-
Single reference image: only one input image is supported for now (the upstream "Only support 1 reference image for now" limit).
-
Guidance semantics:
guidance_scale= text guidance (upstreamtext_guidance_scale, default4.0);> 1.0enables text CFG. Editing typically uses5.0.guidance_scale_2= image guidance (upstreamimage_guidance_scale, default1.0= off). Setting it> 1.0enables the double-guidance path (3 model predictions per step), steering more strongly toward the reference image.
-
CFG-size recommendations:
Request mode Scales Predictions per step Recommended CFG size Base T2I text guidance guidance_scale > 1, no reference2 2 Edit text-only guidance guidance_scale > 1,guidance_scale_2 = 12 2 Edit image-only guidance guidance_scale = 1,guidance_scale_2 > 12 2 Edit double guidance both scales > 13 2 (practical) or 3 (maximum parallelism) CFG off both scales = 11 Reuse a size-2 server safely; no speedup expected Double guidance preserves Boogu's original combination:
pred = positive_with_reference + (text_scale - 1) * (positive_with_reference - negative_with_reference) + (image_scale - 1) * (negative_with_reference - uncond) -
Output resolution: the output size follows the reference image (upstream
align_res, on by default for a single reference), soheight/widthare derived from the input and requested sizes are not applied for edits. -
Same limitations as the Base checkpoint apply except that CFG parallelism is supported as described above; CPU offload, Cache-DiT, TP, SP, and HSDP are still unsupported.
-
Offline editing: the shared offline example
examples/offline_inference/image_to_image/image_edit.pysupports Boogu-Image-Edit directly (--model Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit --guidance-scale 5.0, optional--guidance-scale-2). -
Request batching (
--max-num-seqs > 1) is not bit-exact vs. serial. Compatible TI2I requests (same task type, sameguidance_scale_2explicitness) can share one forward pass. The instruction encoder batches withpadding="longest", so a request's padded batch shape depends on whichever partner request(s) happen to co-arrive, even though production RoPE derives each row's own effective position count from that row's ownattention_mask.sum()rather than from the batch's padded width. In the measurements below,--max-num-seqs 1and--max-num-seqs > 1do not produce pixel-identical output for the same seed; the exact mechanism (padding-shape-dependent kernel/reduction-order numerics vs. some other batch-shape effect) has not been isolated, so treat this as an observed drift under the specific configs below, not a diagnosed root cause, and do not extrapolate the numbers below as a general upper bound on other configs. Two distinct regimes have been measured so far, and they are not interchangeable tolerances:- Fixed-shape co-batch (partner instructions encode to the same
length):
Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit, 512x512, 20 steps, guidance 5/2, one fixed reference image and instruction pair, seeds 42-73, B=2 vs. serial -- mean pixel MAE 1.70/255, max per-image MAE 2.68/255, min PSNR 34.35 dB (2/32 image pairs were pixel-exact). - Heterogeneous partner length (co-batched instructions encode to
different lengths): MAD 2.6-6.0 in the fixed-length partner-mixing
check on this PR's test head -- larger than the fixed-shape case above
in that check. A targeted current-head A/B run observed a comparable
range:
Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit, 512x512, 20 steps, guidance 5/2, one fixed A request (5-token instruction) co-batched in turn with a 2-token and a 49-token partner instruction (both also differing in reference image and content, not length alone;max_num_seqs=2, co-batching verified via request tracing, not assumed) -- solo vs.A+2-token partner MAD 4.06/255 (PSNR 29.9 dB), solo vs.A+49-token partner MAD 3.87/255 (PSNR 29.7 dB), 2-token vs. 49-token partner MAD 4.05/255 (PSNR 30.2 dB). A controlled ablation (same partner content/reference, varying only instruction length) would be needed to isolate a pure length effect, and has not been run. Pin--max-num-seqs 1for any workload that requires strict serial-reproducibility (e.g. golden-image regression tests); use--max-num-seqs > 1only when this drift is acceptable for the throughput gain.
- Fixed-shape co-batch (partner instructions encode to the same
length):
Fast image editing (Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit-Turbo)
Edit-Turbo is the distilled image-editing checkpoint. Its model_index.json
declares BooguImagePipeline, so --model-class-name BooguImageTurboPipeline
is required to reach the four-step DMD path; without it the checkpoint is
served on the dense Edit path. The upstream 1K hotfix is recommended for
stable results and is pinned below to avoid silently loading the older
checkpoint from the repository's default revision.
Command
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit-Turbo \
--omni \
--model-class-name BooguImageTurboPipeline \
--revision hotfix-1k-20260708 \
--port 8091
Verification
Edit an image with the distilled four-step settings:
curl -s http://localhost:8091/v1/images/edits \
-F model="Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Edit-Turbo" \
-F image="@input.png" \
-F prompt="Change the style to a colored pencil drawing." \
-F num_inference_steps=4 \
-F guidance_scale=1.0 \
-F seed=42 \
| jq -r '.data[0].b64_json' | base64 -d > edited-turbo.png
Or via chat completions:
curl -s http://localhost:8091/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"messages": [
{"role": "user", "content": [
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": "data:image/png;base64,<BASE64>"}},
{"type": "text", "text": "Change the style to a colored pencil drawing."}
]}
],
"extra_body": {
"num_inference_steps": 4,
"guidance_scale": 1.0,
"seed": 42
}
}' | jq -r '.choices[0].message.content[0].image_url.url' | cut -d',' -f2- | base64 -d > edited-turbo.png
Notes
- Pinned revision: use
hotfix-1k-20260708; upstream recommends the 1K hotfix over the 1.5K variant for more stable results. - Required settings:
guidance_scale=1.0andguidance_scale_2=1.0; the Turbo pipeline rejects any other value, so theguidance_scale_2=2.0shown for the regular Edit checkpoint does not apply here.num_inference_stepsdefaults to 4. - Reference images: the same single-reference and
align_resbehavior as the regular Edit checkpoint applies. - Known limitations: the same single-GPU limitations as Base and Edit apply; CPU offload, Cache-DiT, and multi-GPU parallelism are not yet validated.
Output format and compression
Image requests accept output_format (png, jpeg, or webp) and
output_compression (0-100). The default is png with the fastest,
least-compressed PNG encode, which is lossless but produces multi-megabyte
payloads. For latency-sensitive clients, output_format: "jpeg" removes
almost the entire response-encoding overhead: on a 1024x1024 Turbo request
the client-observed e2e latency drops from ~900 ms to ~766 ms and the
payload shrinks from ~3.1 MB to ~0.8 MB. Use output_compression to trade
encode time against payload size when PNG must stay lossless: lower values
(e.g. 1) compress harder and produce smaller payloads at proportionally
longer encode times.
Attention backend
The diffusion attention backend defaults to FLASH_ATTN (FlashAttention-2).
On Hopper-class GPUs (SM90) pass --diffusion-attention-backend CUDNN_ATTN
for a measured ~12% engine-time reduction on Boogu-Image workloads:
vllm serve Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo \
--omni \
--diffusion-attention-backend CUDNN_ATTN \
--port 8091
Measured on a 143 GB SM90 card (1024x1024, 4 steps, 5-run mean): stage time
673 ms with CUDNN_ATTN vs 763 ms with the default. Outputs are numerically
different from FLASH_ATTN (different attention kernel) but visually
equivalent, deterministic per seed, and decode identically. On datacenter
Blackwell (SM100 / SM103) use --diffusion-attention-backend TRTLLM_ATTN
instead; it is rejected on SM90.
Performance validation
The checked-in single-device A40 measurements remain the current Boogu baseline: Base T2I is about 16.37 s request latency at concurrency 1 and Edit text-only guidance is about 29.64 s for 512x512, 28-step requests, with roughly 36.8 GB peak memory. CFG-parallel A/B numbers must be collected on the same hardware and software revision before reporting a speedup; do not compare a multi-GPU result against these A40 numbers as if it were a controlled A/B.
Run the dedicated perf rows in
tests/dfx/perf/tests/test_boogu_image_vllm_omni.json and
tests/dfx/perf/tests/test_boogu_image_edit_vllm_omni.json on 2x/3x H100, then
record latency, throughput, and per-GPU peak memory beside the single-device
run. The expected shape is close to the general CFG-parallel range (roughly
1.5x-1.8x for balanced two-branch workloads); the three-branch Edit result will
depend on whether two-rank round-robin or full three-rank execution is used and
must be reported from measurement rather than assumed.