[CI/Build] Clarify model-specific example filename

Signed-off-by: Hongsheng Liu <liuhongsheng4@huawei.com>

.claude/skills/precheck-pr/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: precheck-pr
-description: Self-check your branch before creating a PR — catch dead code, verify accuracy/perf claims, validate PR title format, and confirm merge readiness. Use when the user says "precheck", "self review", "pre-submit check", or "check my PR before I open it." Never posts to GitHub.
+description: Self-check your branch before creating a PR — catch dead code, prevent new model-specific Python examples, verify accuracy/perf claims, validate PR title format, and confirm merge readiness. Use when the user says "precheck", "self review", "pre-submit check", or "check my PR before I open it." Never posts to GitHub.
 ---
 
 # PR Pre-Check
@@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ Ask: "Quick mode or full mode?" Then walk the checklist for the detected PR type
 
 **Also run the Code-Quality sweep on every PR**, regardless of type or mode: the five diff-scoped checks in [references/code-quality.md](references/code-quality.md) — kwargs fragility, broad-except swallow, `Any`/wrong type hints, hot-path `.clone()`/`deepcopy`, and event-loop blocking — plus the advisory conventions (log level, structured logging, synchronization, cleanup, dependencies, naming) in [checklists.md](references/checklists.md). These count only lines the PR *adds* — the pre-existing backlog across the repo is out of scope.
 
+**Also run the Examples-Policy check on every PR** using [references/examples-policy.md](references/examples-policy.md). Inspect only Python paths introduced by the diff. Treat a new model-, checkpoint-, vendor-, or family-specific Python example as blocking; do not report pre-existing example debt.
+
 ### Step 5: Print Report
 
 ```
@@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ Pre-check report for <branch>
   ─────────────────  ──────
   PR title format    ✓
   Code quality       ⚠ 1 broad except, 2 Any hints
+  Examples policy    ✗ new model-specific Python example
   PR desc integrity  ✓
   Registry/config    ✓
   Dead code          ⚠ 2 warnings

.claude/skills/precheck-pr/references/checklists.md

@@ -47,6 +47,19 @@ Diff-scoped sweep for five fragility patterns that are pervasive in the existing
 
 Roll the ⚠/✗ counts into the report as a single **Code quality** dimension row.
 
+---
+
+## All PRs: Examples Policy (run on every PR, quick & full)
+
+Inspect Python files introduced under `examples/` using
+[examples-policy.md](examples-policy.md). This is a diff-scoped ratchet: existing
+model-specific examples may be edited or removed without triggering the check.
+
+- [ ] **No new model-specific Python examples:** the diff adds, copies, or renames no Python file whose path or behavior is specific to one model, checkpoint, vendor, or model family. ✗ for any violation. Route inference through a shared task/protocol entrypoint, model request behavior through `vllm_omni/model_extras`, and commands through task docs or `recipes/`.
+- [ ] **New generic example code is justified:** any new task-neutral Python file under `examples/` is an actual user-facing entrypoint rather than reusable production logic, a benchmark, an app, a setup tool, or a reproducer. ⚠ when the placement is questionable.
+
+Roll the result into the report as a separate **Examples policy** dimension.
+
 ### Conventions (eyeball — no grep)
 
 Judgment calls that don't grep cleanly — apply them while reading the diff, not as a mechanical check:

.claude/skills/precheck-pr/references/examples-policy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+# Examples Python Policy
+
+Prevent new model-specific Python examples without forcing cleanup of the
+existing backlog. Run this check on every PR in quick and full modes.
+
+## Scope
+
+Set the merge base as in the main workflow, then list Python paths introduced
+by the PR, including additions, copies, and renames:
+
+```bash
+BASE="$(git merge-base HEAD origin/main)"
+git diff --name-status --diff-filter=ACR --find-renames --find-copies \
+  "${BASE}"...HEAD -- 'examples/**/*.py'
+```
+
+Inspect destination paths for copies and renames. Existing model-specific files
+that are only modified or deleted are grandfathered and must not be reported.
+
+## Blocking classification
+
+Mark ✗ when a newly introduced Python file does any of the following:
+
+- Names or scopes a path to one model, checkpoint, vendor, or model family.
+- Hard-codes a model identifier, model-specific prompt, request shape, output
+  conversion, or launch configuration behind an otherwise generic filename.
+- Duplicates an existing task/protocol runner to demonstrate one model.
+- Adds a per-model helper below a generic task hub such as `text_to_speech/`.
+
+Do not infer safety from a generic filename alone. For example, a file named
+`text_to_audio.py` is still model-specific if it only implements one model's
+contract.
+
+## Acceptable additions
+
+A new Python example may pass when it is a genuinely model-neutral,
+user-facing task or protocol entrypoint. It must accept model selection through
+configuration and keep model-specific behavior out of the script.
+
+Use ⚠ when the file is model-neutral but reusable logic appears misplaced under
+`examples/`. Route code by purpose:
+
+| Code purpose | Preferred location |
+|---|---|
+| Model prompt, defaults, request/output adaptation | `vllm_omni/model_extras/` or production model modules |
+| Runnable model command and validation evidence | Task documentation or `recipes/` |
+| UI or interactive application | `apps/` |
+| Benchmark or evaluator | `benchmarks/` |
+| Regression reproducer | `tests/` |
+| Download, conversion, or setup utility | `tools/` |
+
+If a model cannot use an existing shared runner, report the missing generic
+capability. Do not solve the gap by adding a model-specific Python example.
+
+## Report format
+
+Add one row to the pre-check report:
+
+```text
+Examples policy    ✓ no new Python example paths
+Examples policy    ⚠ generic helper belongs in tools/
+Examples policy    ✗ examples/offline_inference/new_model/end2end.py is model-specific
+Examples policy    ✗ examples/offline_inference/x_to_y_model_name.py is model-specific
+```
+
+For a blocker, name the path, the model-specific behavior, and the appropriate
+shared runner or destination. Do not propose deleting unrelated existing
+examples as part of the PR.

.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md

@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ If docs and live code disagree, verify the code/tests and report the drift.
 | [test-quality-evaluation.md](references/checks/test-quality-evaluation.md) | Tests change, are absent for risky code, or may not exercise production behavior. |
 | [tests-docs-checklist.md](references/checks/tests-docs-checklist.md) | Coverage, CI markers, examples, user docs, or PR evidence need review. |
 | [verification.md](references/checks/verification.md) | Hardware, a server, or a runnable affected path is available for active verification. |
+| [examples-policy.md](../precheck-pr/references/examples-policy.md) | The PR adds, copies, or renames Python under `examples/`; apply the canonical policy shared with `precheck-pr`. |
 
 ### Delivery and reviewer coordination
 
@@ -152,6 +153,13 @@ contract they protect or use only the applicable evidence checks.
 Apply every category in [general-checks.md](references/process/general-checks.md) before
 lower-priority comments.
 
+If the diff census contains an added, copied, or renamed Python path under
+`examples/`, read and apply the canonical
+[examples policy](../precheck-pr/references/examples-policy.md). Treat a new
+model-specific Python example as blocking. Do not flag model-specific example
+debt that the PR only modifies or removes, and do not run the rest of the
+author-oriented `precheck-pr` workflow.
+
 For each changed value or behavior, trace:
 
 ```text