chore: satisfy changed-file policy
Scoped pre-commit over the 27 files this rebase touches: ruff format reflow, the vLLM-Omni SPDX copyright line on the new modules, and wording the typos hook rejected. The Python 3.10 mypy hook still reports 24 errors across five of these files. All 24 sit on pre-existing lines; none fall on a line this rebase changed, which the repository documents as the CI-skipped condition. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146Xu5Sgj4vXxLxvLjV5YPj Signed-off-by: tzhouam <tzhouam@connect.ust.hk>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
08884c4cfb
commit
9a399adba8
19 files changed
+30
-42
No files matched your search
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
||||
# SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright contributors to the vLLM project
|
||||
# SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright contributors to the vLLM-Omni project
|
||||
|
||||
import asyncio
|
||||
import queue
|
||||
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ import vllm.v1.core.single_type_kv_cache_manager as native_kv_managers
|
||||
from pytest_mock import MockerFixture
|
||||
from vllm.v1.kv_cache_interface import FullAttentionSpec, KVCacheConfig, KVCacheGroupSpec
|
||||
|
||||
from tests.helpers.kv_layout import build_kv_cache_tensor
|
||||
from vllm_omni.diffusion.data import DiffusionOutput, DiffusionRequestAbortedError
|
||||
from vllm_omni.diffusion.diffusion_engine import DiffusionEngine, DiffusionExecutionMode
|
||||
from vllm_omni.diffusion.diffusion_kv.config import DiffusionKVCacheMode
|
||||
@@ -27,7 +28,6 @@ from vllm_omni.diffusion.sched import (
|
||||
from vllm_omni.diffusion.sched.interface import CachedRequestData, NewRequestData
|
||||
from vllm_omni.diffusion.worker.utils import BatchRunnerOutput, RunnerOutput
|
||||
from vllm_omni.inputs.data import OmniDiffusionSamplingParams
|
||||
from tests.helpers.kv_layout import build_kv_cache_tensor
|
||||
|
||||
pytestmark = [pytest.mark.core_model, pytest.mark.cpu, pytest.mark.diffusion]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user