[Rebase] Rebase to vllm 0.28.0 (#6606)

Signed-off-by: tzhouam <tzhouam@connect.ust.hk>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Zhou TaichangandClaude Opus 5 authored and GitHub committed 2026-08-27 06:12:55 +00:00
1 parent da4a08b65b
commit 651b03225b
42 files changed
+931 -121

No files matched your search

+3 -3
View File
@@ -19,10 +19,10 @@ uv venv --python 3.12 --seed
source .venv/bin/activate
# On CUDA
uv pip install vllm==0.26.0 --torch-backend=auto
uv pip install vllm==0.28.0 --torch-backend=auto
# On ROCm
uv pip install vllm==0.26.0+rocm723 --extra-index-url https://wheels.vllm.ai/rocm/0.26.0/rocm723
uv pip install vllm==0.28.0+rocm723 --extra-index-url https://wheels.vllm.ai/rocm/0.28.0/rocm723
git clone https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-omni.git
cd vllm-omni
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ For additional installation methods — please see the [installation guide](inst
!!! note
It is important to install the same major & minor version of vLLM and vLLM Omni, otherwise things may not work as expected. If the versions are misaligned, you will see a warning when you import vLLM Omni.
If you are seeing strange behavior with the `vllm` command not handling the `--omni` flag correctly, you most likely have a version mismatch with vLLM < `0.26.0` and vLLM Omni `0.26.0`, as vLLM Omni no longer hijacks the vLLM entrypoint. Updating vLLM should resolve this issue.
If you are seeing strange behavior with the `vllm` command not handling the `--omni` flag correctly, you most likely have a version mismatch with vLLM < `0.28.0` and vLLM Omni `0.28.0`, as vLLM Omni no longer hijacks the vLLM entrypoint. Updating vLLM should resolve this issue.
## Offline Inference